Skip to Content

What percentage of Army officers see combat?

The percentage of Army officers who see combat varies depending on various factors and can not be easily quantified in a single number. As of 2018, only 10.5% of former active-duty Army officers had seen combat.

However, this statistic generally applies to those who served during intermittent military conflicts and does not reflect the experience of individual officers and factors such as deployments in a combat or hostile environment.

The percentage of officers who experienced active combat also depends on their branch, role, and length of service. Officers in combat branches, such as infantry and artillery, tend to have a much higher rate of combat experience than other branches of the Army.

Additionally, officers who serve in certain posts, such as those which see heavy fighting in current armed conflicts, are more likely to see combat than officers in other posts. Finally, those Army officers who serve for longer periods of time tend to have greater chances of seeing combat than those who serve in shorter tours.

In short, while it isn’t possible to provide an exact statistic for the percentage of Army officers who have seen combat, it is generally accepted that it is a relatively small percentage. This is due to the various factors mentioned above as well as the relatively limited scope of combat engagements in recent years.

Do officers in the Army see combat?

Yes, officers in the Army do see combat. During any deployment, officers will usually be placed in the front lines with their soldiers in order to lead, direct, and ensure that their orders are followed.

In addition, officers are likely to engage in direct combat operations with the enemy, as well as planning and commanding engagements from a strategic point of view. An officer will also typically be responsible for their soldiers’ safety, which means that if their soldiers come under attack, the officer will respond and fight back with them.

In addition, officers are expected to be able to handle a range of weapons and tactics, and use these skills in combat situations. Ultimately, all Army officers are expected to be capable of leading their soldiers in combat and engaging the enemy in order to protect their country.

How many officers see combat?

The number of officers who see combat often depends on several factors, such as role, branch, deployment length, and more. Generally, officers who serve in the Army, Air Force, or Marine Corps are more likely to see combat than officers in the Navy.

Within those branches, the proportion of officers who see combat can vary significantly depending on their specialty and job. For example, pilots or those in special forces may see more combat action, while those in administrative positions or with different specializations may see much less.

Combat deployments also tend to be longer for officers than enlisted personnel, so officers may be exposed to dramatically more combat experiences overall. It is challenging to provide an exact number of officers who see combat, due to the variations in these factors, but overall, it is likely that a significant proportion of officers in the armed forces do see combat during or after their deployment.

What job in the Army sees the most combat?

The job in the Army that sees the most combat is typically determined by a variety of factors, as some Army units are more likely to see combat than others. Generally speaking, the job that sees the most combat is that of an Infantry Soldier.

Infantry Soldiers are the tip of the spear, the ones who are sent into the most dangerous and high-risk environments to engage with enemy forces. Additionally, they are trained to be the first responders when engaging with enemy targets, as they are well-versed in small-arms tactics, light- and heavy-weapons usage, urban combat scenarios, and air power support.

Additionally, Airborne, Ranger, and Special Forces units are also likely to see higher levels of combat due to their specialized training and mission requirement.

What is the hardest position in the Army?

The hardest position in the Army depends largely on individual experience, capabilities, and preference. For instance, some people might find front-line infantry incredibly demanding, while others with different skillsets may do just as well in mechanics.

However, there are some positions that are considered to be more physically and mentally demanding than others.

Examples of arduous positions include those in Special Operations Forces such as the Navy SEALS, the Army Rangers, and the Delta Force. Special Operations Forces often face complex mission objectives that require significant physical preparation, tactical know-how, and psychological resources.

Combat medics are tasked with providing medical attention in dangerous situations, and also need a great deal of perseverance, courage, and resilience. Airborne troops may often encounter more dangerous conditions than their counterparts due to the nature of their deployments.

Generally, all military personnel face difficult circumstances in one way or another, and ultimately, each individual’s experience will depend on their own unique circumstances. It can be said, however, that those who serve in the most physically and mentally demanding positions have an incredibly important, courageous, and selfless role in the Army.

Which Army is in combat?

At the current moment, a number of armies around the world are actively engaged in combat. These include the armies of the United States, Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, India, Pakistan, and a number of other countries.

The United States Army, along with its allies, is fighting in wars and conflicts in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen and other areas of the Middle East and North Africa. Russian forces are engaged in military operations in Syria and other former Soviet countries such as Ukraine and Georgia.

China is being engaged in military efforts in the South China Sea and along its border with India. Iran and its allies are involved in various proxy wars and skirmishes in the Middle East. North Korea continues to rashly test missiles and nuclear capabilities, and its army is a major deterrent in their region.

Meanwhile, Turkey is involved in operations in Syria and Iraq, and Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries have taken military action in Yemen. India and Pakistan remain on high alert and continually in conflict over territorial disputes in Kashmir.

Clearly, there are numerous armies around the world in combat and engaged in military operations.

What is the combat MOS?

The combat MOS, or Military Occupational Specialty, is an occupation within the military that provides job training and skills that can be applied in the more physically demanding aspects of a military career.

These occupations involve combat-related tasks such as reconnaissance, demolition, patrolling, and infantry operations. Combat MOSs are typically for those with a higher degree of skill and dedication than in other MOS jobs, and often require specialized and advanced training.

Examples of combat MOS include Infantry (11B), Field Artillery (13B), Special Forces (18A/B/C/D), Counterintelligence/Human Intelligence (35F), Psychological Operations (37F), Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operator (15W), and Explosive Ordnance Disposal (89D).

Each of these specialties requires a different type of physical and mental preparation, and each provides an in-depth look at a unique area of combat operations.

What’s the MOS in the Army?

The MOS (Military Occupational Specialty) in the Army is an alphanumeric code which identifies a soldier’s primary specialty, such as a M1 Armor Crewman (19K). The MOS is assigned within each branch of the Army, so a soldier may have a different MOS than another in a different branch.

Each MOS has a variety of jobs and tasks associated with it. For example, an M1 Armor Crewman is the driver and gunner of an M1 tank. They must be skilled in operating the tank, as well as performing basic maintenance, inspecting, and servicing the tank and associated equipment/components.

Additionally, M1 Armor Crewmans are responsible for combat operations, battlefield reconnaissance, and maintaining security for their unit.

Do captains see combat?

It depends on the type of captain and the situation they are in. In military services, captains are typically responsible for commanding a company or platoon. Depending on the service and the context, they may not see combat, as they serve mainly in leadership roles.

Generally speaking, they will be in the field where combat is occurring and could potentially see some combat depending on the mission.

In the US military, most captains will not see actual combat since they are in tactical commands only and are responsible for operations planning, logistics and supply chain management, administrative roles and other duties that are not directly associated with combat.

However, it is still possible for them to come under direct fire, so the risk of combat exposure is always present.

In a Naval context, captains are the commander-in-chief of their vessel and the risk of combat is higher, as they are typically deployed to conflict zones. Captains in this context often see action and may be called upon to lead their vessel in combat operations.

In other services, like the Coast Guard, captains may find themselves in a variety of combat-related situations since they are force multipliers across mission areas. Depending on the mission, captains could be inserted into various hotspots around the world where direct combat engagement is possible.

What is the highest military rank that can see combat?

The highest military rank that can see combat is the five-star general or admiral rank. This includes the General of the Army, General of the Air Force, Admiral of the Navy, Fleet Admiral, and General of the Marine Corps.

These individuals are the highest-ranking officers in the United States military and are in charge of all military operations. Although they are not actively leading combat operations, they are responsible for strategic operations and have the authority to deploy or authorize military forces.

These officers have historically been responsible for “seizing the initiative” on the battlefield by exercising their independent judgement and command authority.

What do captains do in war?

Captains are a very important role in war. They are typically responsible for leading and commanding troops in battle and guiding them through dangerous territories and environments. Additionally, they are often required to coordinate closely with other commanders and leaders in order to ensure that their troops perform their duties and tasks to the best of their abilities.

The job of a captain requires someone with a great deal of knowledge, leadership skills, and the willingness to make difficult decisions in a fast-paced and often dangerous environment. During battle, captains are usually responsible for making tactical decisions about when and how troops should move, where they should attack, and which units should be used for specific operations or missions.

They are also responsible for making sure that their troops have the support and resources they need to complete their mission successfully. Finally, captains must also ensure that their troops are acting ethically and in accordance with the rules of war and the laws of their country.

How many soldiers are under a captain?

The exact number of soldiers under a captain can vary depending on the type of unit they are leading and their branch of service. In the U.S. Army, a captain typically commands a company, which can consist of anywhere from 50 to over 200 soldiers.

In the Marines, a captain usually commands a company consisting of about 130 Marines, including the officers in charge. In the Navy, a captain is usually in charge of a ship with up to 300 sailors and in the Air Force, a captain typically leads a flight with multiple aircraft and several airmen.

A captain can also be in command of a platoon, typically consisting of 40 to 50 soldiers, or a troop, which is generally composed of 70 to 100 soldiers. Additionally, a captain may be in charge of any number of staff officers or other personnel.

Ultimately, the number of soldiers under a captain can fluctuate based on numerous factors.

Who sees more combat Army or Marines?

The answer to the question of who sees more combat, Army or Marines, is not an easy one to answer. While the Marine Corps is often thought of as the branch of service most likely to be involved in combat operations, that is not necessarily the case.

Both the Army and the Marine Corps play vital roles in combat operations and both branches have seen their fair share of combat deployments in the past.

In terms of the number of deployments, the Army has seen, and continues to see, more deployment operations than the Marine Corps. This is largely because the Army is larger than the Marine Corps, and is thus more often needed in more locations.

Additionally, the Army has more roles that can be filled with fewer personnel than other branches, allowing them to more easily meet the needs of an ever-evolving military field.

The Marine Corps, however, has traditionally been seen as the more combat-oriented branch of the service. Thanks to its amphibious doctrine, the Marine Corps is often given the task of taking and securing beaches and other land areas, making them the first service to arrive and begin operations.

For this reason, they are often the first to “engage the enemy” and are put in more dangerous situations than other branches of the service.

Therefore, while the Army has been and continues to be more frequently deployed than the Marine Corps, and often sees more of the “traditional” combat roles, the Marine Corps is equally important in combat operations and has often been seen at the forefront of the fight.

Ultimately, it depends on the specific operation and the role the service is fulfillling at any given time.

What do 2nd lieutenants do in the Army?

2nd lieutenants in the Army typically have an important role that carries a lot of responsibility. They act as the direct leaders of squads or platoons, and are in charge of managing the day-to-day operations of those units.

This includes giving orders, providing guidance, giving feedback, and helping the soldiers in their unit develop their skills and abilities. They also attend staff meetings and take part in problem-solving discussions.

Additionally, 2nd lieutenants are usually responsible for the training and development of their units, ensuring that they are prepared for the challenges they face on the battlefield. In this role they design, implement and oversee training exercises, evaluate training results, and advise their superiors on the effectiveness of their unit’s training regime.

They also serve as an important point of contact for their unit, interfacing with higher commands and other units, both in their capacity as a direct leader and as a representative of their unit. This means that they have a role to play in gathering and disseminating important updates and instructions from higher up the chain of command.

Finally, 2nd lieutenants are tasked with the general upkeep and maintenance of their unit. This includes anything from making sure that their unit is supplied with the necessary equipment to maintaining records and communications for their unit’s staff.

Does a 2nd LT outrank a SGT major?

No, a 2nd Lieutenant (2LT) does not outrank a Sergeant Major (SGM). The 2LT is a commissioned officer in the United States military, while the SGM is an enlisted leader. In terms of rank, a 2LT is the lowest ranking commissioned officer while the SGM is the highest ranking enlisted member.

Generally, a commissioned officer has authority over enlisted personnel and a responsibility to lead them while enlisted personnel provide the experience and expertise towards the tasks at hand. However, in a particular situation, an assigned SGM may have authority over a 2LT, such as when the 2LT is assigned to a unit commanded by the SGM.

In this situation, the SGM will normally provide guidance and support to the 2LT, but the 2LT still has the final say.