Skip to Content

Why are lottery tickets illegal in Alabama?

Alabama is one of only a handful of states that still completely prohibits lotteries and the sale of lottery tickets. This long-standing ban stems from the state’s conservative social views and desire to restrict gambling. Many lawmakers and residents argue that lotteries prey on the poor and can lead to addiction. However, others contend that lotteries provide an important source of revenue for education and other public services. The debate over legalizing a state lottery has raged in Alabama for decades.

History of Anti-Gambling Sentiment in Alabama

Alabama has historically taken a hardline stance against gambling and lotteries. When Alabama first became a state in 1819, its constitution banned games of chance and selling lottery tickets. This reflected moral views at the time that gambling was a sinful and corrupt activity. In the late 1800s, Congress banned the use of the US mail for lotteries, which effectively ended the widespread lottery system used to raise money for civic projects in early America. Alabama strengthened its anti-gambling laws in 1901 when it adopted a new state constitution during the Jim Crow era that explicitly prohibited all lotteries.

For most of the 20th century, the only legal gambling permitted in Alabama was pari-mutuel betting on horse races. Even this was highly regulated and restricted to just a few locations. Charitable gambling like bingo for churches and nonprofit groups was also tightly controlled. The state strictly enforced its ban on casinos and private lotteries. Politicians argued lotteries and gambling went against Alabama values and led to criminal activity and exploitation of the poor. Alabama resisted the spread of state lotteries across much of the U.S. in the 1970s, 80s and 90s.

Attempts to Establish a State Lottery

Despite the long-standing opposition, there have been several attempts to establish a state-sanctioned lottery in Alabama. In the late 1980s, a proposed constitutional amendment to allow a lottery passed the Alabama House but failed to get Senate approval. In 1992, another lottery amendment passed the House but was defeated in a statewide voter referendum. A 1999 lottery amendment also failed at the polls amid concerns over using lottery revenues to subsidize education costs.

In more recent years, Republican Governor Bob Riley established a task force in 2003 to explore instituting a state lottery to boost education funding. The task force recommended a lottery program, but legislation stalled in the state legislature. In 2010, the state Senate passed a lottery bill, but it died in the House. Proposals from Democratic representatives and a lottery study commission in 2016 went nowhere.

Governor Kay Ivey established a new lottery study group in 2019. It proposed a paper-based instant ticket lottery with proceeds going to education. The group estimated annual revenues of $167 million. However, Ivey did not actively champion legislation, and the Republican-controlled legislature again did not pass any lottery bills.

Groups For and Against a State Lottery

The debate over legalizing a lottery in Alabama has typically pitted two powerful forces against each other – black political leaders and churches.

Many African American activists and Democratic lawmakers have led the push for a state lottery. They see it as a crucial way to generate new revenues that could be used to increase funding for K-12 schools, college scholarships, and other educational programs. Groups like the Alabama Democratic Conference and Alabama New South Coalition have argued a lottery would be especially beneficial for underfunded schools in predominantly black communities. Leaders contend the lack of a lottery places Alabama at a competitive disadvantage compared to neighboring states like Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, and Tennessee that do have lotteries generating hundreds of millions for education.

On the other side, conservative Christian groups like the Alabama Citizens Action Program and Alabama Policy Institute have adamantly fought any state lottery proposals. They view lotteries as explicitly preying on the poor to raise revenues. Church leaders argue lotteries contradict Bible teachings against gambling and encourage immoral behavior. They believe legalizing any form of gambling goes against Alabama principles and family values. Churches have pressured legislators to continue blocking lottery legislation.

The debate has largely broken down along racial, political and religious lines. African Americans and Democrats argue the revenues are desperately needed for education. White conservatives and churches contend gambling is a threat to moral character. Without strong support across these divides, proposals have failed to gain enough traction to change the law.

Current Legal Status of Lotteries in Alabama

While efforts to establish a lottery have faltered, Alabama law still completely prohibits any unauthorized lotteries within the state. Section 65 of the Alabama Constitution states:

“The legislature shall have no power to authorize lotteries or gift enterprises for any purposes, and shall pass laws to prohibit the sale in this state of lottery or gift enterprise tickets, or tickets in any scheme in the nature of a lottery…”

This provision categorically bans the legislature from legalizing any form of lottery. Additionally, Section 13A-12-20 of the Alabama Criminal Code makes it illegal to:

“- Set up, promote or aid in setting up or promoting any lottery for money or anything of value;

– Conduct any lottery drawing for the distribution of a prize or prizes by lot or chance, or advertise or otherwise disseminate information about any lottery drawing;

– Possess any lottery device or record;

– Transfer any item in exchange for participation in a lottery; or

– Aid or abet any of these prohibited activities.”

Violating the lottery law is a Class A misdemeanor. This means potential punishment of up to a year in jail and $6,000 in fines for individuals who sell lottery tickets or engage in unauthorized gambling operations.

There is an exception for bona fide contests and sweepstakes promotions that are free to enter and do not involve any payment or gambling. Charitable groups can hold raffles if they get a permit from the district attorney and Sheriff. But in general, the lottery prohibition is far-reaching and covers almost any scheme deciding winners by chance.

Alabama law does allow pari-mutuel betting at licensed horse racing, dog racing and jai alai facilities under the oversight of the Alabama Racing Commission. There are currently two operational greyhound tracks and one horse track for regulated race betting. However, these gaming activities are limited in scope and tightly governed by the Commission.

The Poarch Band of Creek Indians also operates several electronic bingo casinos on tribal land under federal rules that allow gaming on Indian reservations. But this is done under tribal sovereignty rather than authorization by state law.

Aside from these exceptions, selling any lottery-style tickets – including for nationwide lotteries like Powerball and Mega Millions – remains completely against Alabama law. Residents must cross state lines into Florida, Georgia or Tennessee to purchase lottery tickets. The ban also applies to casino-style gaming, video gambling machines and most other commercial gambling.

Reasons for the Lottery Ban

Alabama has stubbornly maintained its blanket lottery prohibition for a combination of cultural, political and economic factors:

Social Conservatism and Religious Objections

A core reason is the socially conservative beliefs rooted in the Bible Belt culture. Gambling has traditionally been viewed as a sinful vice leading to addiction and corruption. Churches argue state sponsorship of lotteries contradicts Biblical teachings. This evangelical Protestant ethic remains pervasive, especially outside urban areas. Lawmakers from strongly religious districts have stalled any lottery progress.

Concerns over Fairness and Targeting the Poor

Some oppose lotteries on moral grounds that they disproportionately take money from lower-income residents desperate for a miraculous jackpot. Communities of color also spend more on average on lottery tickets. Critics argue it is wrong for the state to raise revenues by implicitly taxing the hopes of poorer people.

Divisive Racial Politics

The lottery issue has often divided along racial lines. Many white conservatives morally oppose gambling. African Americans in the Alabama Black Belt see lottery revenues as crucial funding. It’s proven politically difficult to bridge this divide.

Disagreements over Use of Revenue

Debates have occurred over whether to earmark lottery revenues for education or allow more flexible uses. Some want proceeds allocated to college scholarships. Others argue K-12 schools with high poverty rates should get priority. Determining how to divide the money has hindered consensus.

Concerns over Effective Regulation

Alabama already struggled to regulate legalized gambling at race tracks. Some worry the state lacks capacity to prevent abuse and corruption of an expanded lottery system. Diversion of revenues for political purposes could also be an issue.

Loss of Existing Gambling Revenue

Owners of dog racing tracks now allowed in Alabama have lobbied against a state lottery that could reduce their revenues. Native American casinos have also cautiously viewed lotteries as possible competition.

Caution over a Major Policy Change

After nearly 200 years of restrictions, legalizing lottery sales would be a dramatic shift that some oppose on principle. Lawmakers from areas without public demand may see little reason to change the status quo.

Impacts of Not Having a Lottery

The lack of an Alabama lottery likely produces both positive and negative effects:

Lost Government Revenue

The $400 million or more in annual lottery ticket sales instead occur across state lines. This deprives Alabama of potential tax revenue that could support education, infrastructure and other public needs.

Reduced Funding for Education

Education proponents argue schools, scholarships and assistance programs are underfunded without the revenues a lottery could provide. This makes improving education outcomes more difficult.

Inconvenience for Residents

Alabamians must drive to neighboring states if they wish to purchase lottery tickets, which is inconvenient. Residents in cities like Auburn near the Georgia border can easily cross state lines, but it is costlier for those deep in Alabama.

Some Regulatory Benefits

The lottery ban limits the spread of gambling. This prevents broader negative societal consequences that could come from widespread gambling access.

Reduced Incentive for Political Corruption

Massive lottery systems have sometimes led to improper use of funds and political scandals in other states. Alabama avoids this temptation by not having lottery revenues up for grabs.

There are reasonable arguments on both sides of this issue. Each state must weigh whether potential revenues and convenience are worth the risks and moral concerns posed by state-sponsored lotteries. This calculation involves complex social, political and economic considerations. Alabama has so far come down on the side of restricting access to lottery gambling, but pressure remains to reverse course.

Future Outlook

The debate over legalizing lotteries is likely to continue in Alabama. Several trends could potentially shift dynamics:

– Continued budget shortfalls may increase urgency from education advocates to establish a lottery

– Republican opposition will soften if social conservatives lose influence over the party

– Voters from younger generations without moral objections may eventually favor change

– Lottery allowances in all surrounding states could increase cross-border sales pressure

– Constitutional reform to allow gambling without a full amendment could open the door

However, significant hurdles remain. A statewide vote of approval is required to authorize a lottery, and opposition remains strong in many rural white districts. Church groups will continue lobbying against change. Disputes over appropriate use of revenues must be resolved. Powerful gambling interests may try to block added competition.

Real change likely depends on building an interracial coalition between black Democrats and urban Republicans open to a highly-regulated lottery. Compromise proposals that restrict gaming could gain favor. But easy resolution is improbable on this polarized issue. Alabama is approaching 200 years without a lottery, so overturning the ban will not occur suddenly. Yet the massive revenues at stake ensure that lottery advocates will continue their push.

Conclusion

Alabama’s long-standing ban on lotteries stems from its Bible Belt roots, conservative social values, and desire to restrict gambling. While many see lotteries as a harmless entertainment, others argue they prey on the poor and can lead to addiction. Attempts to establish a state lottery to fund education have failed to gain enough momentum. Lawmakers face pressure from competing sides – those wanting revenues for underfunded schools versus evangelical groups morally opposed to state promotion of gambling. This had led to political stalemate on changing state law. For now, the blanket prohibition remains in place, forcing residents to cross state lines if they wish to buy lottery tickets. With massive jackpots continuing to grow, the Alabama lottery issue will likely be brought up again. But overcoming the political divides to authorize ticket sales will remain challenging unless compromise proposals gain bipartisan support.