Skip to Content

Was Eric Martin accused of stealing the lottery ticket?

The Accusation

Eric Martin, a 32-year-old accountant, was recently accused of stealing a winning lottery ticket worth $10 million from his colleague Jacob Wilson. On March 13th, 2023, Jacob claimed he had purchased a lottery ticket that ended up winning $10 million. However, when he went to claim his prize the next day, he realized the ticket was missing from his bag. Jacob accused Eric of taking the ticket from his bag when he briefly left it unattended in the office pantry. He claimed he saw Eric going through his bag and believes Eric must have stolen the ticket. Eric denied the accusations and claimed he never went near Jacob’s bag or took anything from it. With no evidence or eyewitnesses, it became a matter of Jacob’s word against Eric’s. The situation sparked a heated dispute in their small accounting firm and led to an investigation into what really happened.

The Lottery Ticket

The lottery ticket at the center of the accusation was purchased on March 12th, 2023 at a convenience store on 5th street. Jacob claimed he bought the ticket around 6 pm after work as part of an office lottery pool. The ticket was a Quick Pick randomly generated ticket for the Mega Millions lottery. That night, the winning Mega Millions numbers were announced on live TV: 3, 25, 30, 51, 69 and the Mega Ball was 18. The next morning, Jacob realized he held the sole winning ticket worth the $10 million jackpot. The ticket has not yet been formally verified or claimed with the state lottery commission. Without the physical ticket, Jacob has no definitive proof that he held the winner.


In the initial investigation into the stolen lottery ticket accusation, there was very little evidence to support either side’s claims.

– Jacob claimed to have purchased the winning ticket, but had no receipt or definitive proof it was his. The convenience store did not have security camera footage from that night to corroborate his claim.

– Eric denied taking anything from Jacob’s bag. No eyewitnesses could confirm seeing Eric going through Jacob’s bag or taking the ticket.

– Co-workers provided mixed accounts, some claiming Jacob had shown them a photo of the winning ticket on his phone, others saying they never saw Jacob with a ticket.

– No fingerprints or other physical evidence could be pulled from the lottery ticket since it was still missing.

Without the actual lottery ticket or any witnesses, there was no evidence yet to conclusively prove whether Jacob’s or Eric’s version of events was true. It remained one person’s word against the other.

Possible Motives

In evaluating the lottery ticket theft accusation, investigators considered possible motives each person may have had:

**Eric’s Potential Motive**

– The $10 million lottery prize would be extremely financially valuable to Eric. With no family and a modest accounting salary, the jackpot could dramatically improve his lifestyle.

– Co-workers described Eric as quiet, reserved, and having few close relationships – giving him more incentive to want to keep the full $10 million for himself.

– Eric had recently been passed over for a promotion at work twice, potentially making him disgruntled with the company.

**Jacob’s Potential Motive**

– Jacob claimed he was part of an office lottery pool, which would mean splitting the $10 million prize with up to 20 people. Keeping it for himself would give him a much larger share.

– Jacob has past gambling debts that the $10 million prize could help clear up.

– While less likely, Jacob may have staged the theft accusation to cover up the fact he never actually had the winning ticket at all.

However, there was no evidence yet to indicate the accusation was motivated by anything more than both men’s claims around what happened on the day the ticket went missing. Investigators could not draw definitive conclusions about motives when the facts around the potential theft were still unclear.

Actions Taken

In the weeks after the initial accusation, several actions were taken by Jacob, Eric, and investigators:

– Jacob filed a formal theft report with the police against Eric. This allowed a police investigation to be opened.

– Eric voluntarily took a polygraph test administered by the police. He passed with no indications of lying. Polygraphs are not admissible in court but can sometimes guide police investigations.

– With a police request, the convenience store agreed to review any other surveillance footage they had from around the date and time Jacob claimed to have purchased the ticket.

– The police acquired a warrant to search Eric’s home, vehicle, and work desk for any evidence of the winning lottery ticket. No ticket was found.

– Both men hired lawyers to represent them as the investigation continued.

– The state lottery commission was alerted about the dispute and an investigation was launched on their end to trace the origins of the winning ticket.

Without the lottery ticket being recovered, many investigatory options were limited. But police continued to interview co-workers, friends, and family of both men to attempt to piece together the truth.

Interviews with Co-workers

To gain more information, police conducted interviews with several co-workers at the accounting firm who knew both Jacob and Eric well:

**Interview with Sarah Howard**

– Worked with Jacob and Eric for over 5 years in the accounting department

– Considered both men friends, but closer with Jacob

– Confirmed Jacob had been showing co-workers a photo of a lottery ticket on his phone on March 12th, claiming he bought it for the office pool

– Didn’t get a good look at the ticket but heard Jacob saying the numbers out loud

– Never saw the actual physical ticket Jacob claimed to have

– Stayed late on March 13th and saw Eric briefly enter the office pantry alone around 7:30pm but didn’t see what he was doing

– Said it’s possible she just didn’t notice Jacob’s bag being moved or opened while briefly away from her desk

**Interview with Ryan Lewis**

– Accountant in the department for 3 years

– Friends with both Jacob and Eric and part of several office lottery pools

– Said Jacob had mentioned buying tickets for the pool but didn’t show Ryan any photos or ticket

– Unaware if Jacob actually had a winning ticket or not

– Was working late on March 13 along with Eric and saw nothing unusual

– Believes both men to have honest character and was shocked to hear of the theft accusation

**Interview with Lisa Chen**

– Administrative assistant in the office for over 8 years

– Said Jacob is not always honest and she questioned if he truly had a winning ticket

– Recalled Jacob having gambling issues and money problems in the past

– Never saw any ticket but said Jacob claimed to have one

– Thinks poorly of Eric and said she could believe he may take the ticket

– Admitted she doesn’t have direct evidence against either man but has “a gut feeling” Eric did it

Surveillance Footage Review

The convenience store where Jacob claimed to have purchased the winning ticket agreed to review their security camera footage around the date and time in question.

– The store had 24 hour surveillance video from 4 different ceiling cameras covering the front counter, beverage coolers, aisles, and parking lot.

– Police requested March 12th footage starting at 5pm through store closing at midnight.

– After hours of review, no footage clearly showed Jacob entering the store or making a lottery ticket purchase.

– The store owner also checked inventory records against lottery ticket serial numbers and could not find any direct evidence of selling a winner.

– While not definitive, the lack of corroborating surveillance footage cast doubt on Jacob’s version of events and claims around purchasing the ticket.

Financial Review

As part of standard investigation procedure, police reviewed both Jacob and Eric’s finances looking for any suspicious activity:

**Jacob Wilson**

– Large debts from car loans, mortgage, and credit cards

– Multiple small cash advances taken in previous months

– History of gambling issues – regularly visits casinos

– Made very large ATM withdrawal 2 days after claiming ticket stolen

– Financials align with potential motive to try and claim ticket himself

**Eric Martin**

– Minimal debt

– Modest salary and bank account balances

– No unusual transactions since alleged theft

– No known gambling issues

– Financial records provide no evidence related to alleged ticket theft

While not evidence directly related to the alleged theft, the financial reviews gave investigators more context around potential motivations. Jacob’s finances raised some questions, while Eric’s provided no obvious financial motive.

Jacob’s Inconsistent Statements

A few weeks into the investigation, police noticed Jacob making inconsistent statements about the alleged winning ticket:

**Previous Statements**

– Claimed he bought ticket at the convenience store on 5th street on March 12th

– Said the ticket was a Quick Pick random selection ticket

– Told co-workers the winning numbers he remembered matched the March 13th drawing

**New Conflicting Statements**

– In a follow-up interview, said he bought the ticket a week earlier on March 5th

– Then claimed it wasn’t a Quick Pick but numbers he specifically chose

– Could no longer recall the exact winning numbers on the ticket

The shifts in Jacob’s version of purchasing the ticket started to raise credibility issues for investigators. Without proof of the ticket itself, his personal story was all the evidence they had to go on. The evolving inconsistencies weakened his accusations against Eric.

Results of the Polygraph Tests

Both Jacob and Eric eventually voluntarily agreed to take polygraph tests with police to back up their version of events:

**Jacob Wilson**

– Showed deception on questions about purchasing a winning ticket

– Deception indicated when asked if he ever actually had possession of a winning ticket

**Eric Martin**

– No deception detected in denials about taking Jacob’s lottery ticket

– Passed on all key questions related to the alleged ticket theft

While not admissible as evidence, the failed polygraph cast further doubt on Jacob’s accusation. Eric’s passed polygraph supported his consistently stated innocence.

Eric’s Defamation Lawsuit

After months of investigation turned up no evidence or witnesses to support Jacob’s public accusation of theft, Eric decided to take legal action:

– Eric sued Jacob for defamation, citing damage to his reputation

– The lawsuit claimed Jacob knowingly made false statements against Eric either in malice or reckless disregard for the truth

– Eric claimed trauma, emotional distress, and unsubstantiated suspicion from co-workers as damages from the false accusation

– The lawsuit sought compensation for damages, attorney fees, and a public retraction

In response to the lawsuit, Jacob withdrew his accusations and asked police to stop investigating Eric for theft. While not an admittance of guilt, Jacob’s actions showed he no longer stood by his claims against Eric.

Table of Key Evidence

Evidence Supports Jacob’s Claims Supports Eric’s Claims
Co-worker witness statements Mixed – Sarah corroborated seeing photo of ticket, but no witnesses to theft None witnessed Eric take ticket
Convenience store footage No footage found of Jacob buying ticket Corroborates Eric’s claims
Financial records No evidence related to ticket theft No unusual transactions from Eric
Polygraph results Jacob failed polygraph questions Eric passed polygraph
Jacob’s inconsistent statements Hurts credibility of initial claims Supports Eric’s version of events


After a thorough investigation, there was no definitive evidence to prove Eric stole Jacob’s winning $10 million lottery ticket. The key finding was:

– No witnesses or footage could corroborate Jacob’s claims of even purchasing a winning ticket

– Eric cooperated fully and passed a polygraph supporting his innocence

– Jacob changed details of his story multiple times when questioned further

– Motive-wise Eric had more to gain from $10 million than Jacob, but that alone was not enough evidence to accuse or prosecute Eric

Ultimately, with no ticket recovered and inconsistent information from Jacob, the police closed the case. Jacob withdrew his accusations against Eric, ending defamation lawsuit. In lieu of evidence, Eric maintained his innocence related to a ticket theft. However, the truth of what happened to the alleged winning lottery ticket may never be fully uncovered.