Skip to Content

Who sold T 80 tanks to Pakistan?

The T-80 tanks were sold to Pakistan by Ukraine in 1996. Ukraine had inherited large numbers of Soviet-era T-80 tanks after the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. The Ukrainian government decided to sell a number of these tanks to various countries in order to raise much-needed foreign exchange. Pakistan was one of the countries that purchased the T-80 tanks from Ukraine.

The T-80 tanks were well-suited to Pakistan’s needs, as they offered a number of advantages over Pakistan’s existing tanks. The T-80 was faster and more maneuverable than the tanks already in Pakistan’s arsenal, and it had superior firepower and armor. Additionally, the T-80 was capable of firing guided missiles, which greatly increased its effectiveness against heavily armored targets.

The sale of the T-80 tanks to Pakistan was controversial, as it caused concern among some of Pakistan’s neighbors, particularly India. The Indian government argued that the sale of the T-80 tanks to Pakistan could upset the balance of power in the region, and that it could be used to destabilize the region.

Despite these concerns, Ukraine went ahead with the sale of the T-80 tanks to Pakistan. The tanks were delivered to Pakistan in 1997, and they were quickly put into service with the Pakistani army. Today, the T-80 tanks continue to be an important part of Pakistan’s military capabilities, and they are often used in military exercises and other training activities.

How many T-80 tanks does Ukraine have?

According to recent reports, Ukraine currently possesses a significant number of T-80 tanks in its arsenal. The exact number of T-80 tanks that Ukraine has in its inventory is not publicly disclosed due to security reasons and confidentiality.

However, considering past reports and assessments by various defense analysts, it is estimated that Ukraine has around 200 to 300 T-80 tanks in its active service. These tanks are the main battle tanks that were primarily designed and built in the Soviet Union during the 1970s and 1980s. They have undergone significant upgrades and modernizations over time to enhance their capabilities and effectiveness in modern warfare.

The T-80 tanks are considered to be one of the most reliable and advanced battle tanks in the world. They are equipped with advanced weaponry, armor, and sophisticated electronic systems, making them formidable weapons on the battlefield. The tanks are designed to operate in diverse environmental conditions, including extreme weather and difficult terrains, making them an important asset for Ukraine, which is currently facing a range of security challenges, including conflicts with Russia.

Ukraine is believed to have a significant number of T-80 tanks, which are critical in enhancing its defense capabilities and deterring potential aggressors. Although exact figures are not available, it is clear that Ukraine considers the T-80 tanks as an important asset and continues to invest in upgrading and modernizing these tanks to meet the evolving security threats.

How many t90m tanks has Russia lost in Ukraine?

The t90m tank is one of the most advanced and feared tanks in Russia’s arsenal, but it is difficult to determine how many of them have been lost in Ukraine as there is limited public information available about the conflict. Additionally, both sides of the conflict tend to deny losses or exaggerate their successes, making it challenging to get an accurate count of the damage inflicted on military equipment. without access to up-to-date information and detailed reports, it is impossible to give a precise estimate of how many t90m tanks Russia has lost in Ukraine.

Does Ukraine have T-64 tanks?

Yes, Ukraine does have T-64 tanks. The T-64 is a main battle tank that was designed and produced by the Soviet Union in the 1960s. It was first introduced into service in 1967 and has continued to be used by various countries around the world. Ukraine was one of the primary users of the T-64, with Soviet-era T-64s being sent to the Ukrainian Armed Forces when Ukraine gained independence in 1991.

In addition to these older T-64s, Ukraine has also continued to produce the updated T-64BM Bulat variant of the tank. The T-64BM Bulat features a more powerful engine, improved optics and electronics, and increased armor protection compared to the older T-64 models. This upgraded variant has seen action in the ongoing conflict in Eastern Ukraine.

While the T-64 remains an important part of Ukraine’s tank fleet, it is no longer the main battle tank of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. The country has shifted its focus to more modern tanks such as the T-84 Oplot and the BM Oplot, which offer increased armor protection, better fire control systems, and more advanced electronics. However, the T-64 remains an important part of Ukraine’s arsenal and will likely continue to be used for years to come.

What is currently the tank in the world?

When it comes to military tanks, there are several factors that are considered to determine their effectiveness and strength. These factors can include firepower, armor, mobility, and technological advancements.
Currently, the United States has the most advanced military tanks in the world, which are the M1 Abrams and the M1A2 Abrams. These tanks are known for their advanced technology, mobility, and robust armor. The tanks have a 120mm smoothbore cannon that can shoot most types of ammunition, including armor-piercing shells that can penetrate enemy tanks easily. This firepower is truly impressive, making it the primary reason why the M1A2 Abrams is regarded as one of the most powerful tanks in the world.

Another remarkable tank is the Russian T-14 Armata, which is currently one of Russia’s best military tanks. The tank is equipped with high-tech features such as an automated turret and a 125mm smoothbore cannon, along with a unique armor system that makes it invisible to infrared or thermal detection. The T-14 Armata has a crew of three and has a top speed of 80 km/h.

In terms of overall firepower and armor, the German Leopard 2 is also a highly regarded tank. The Leopard 2 is equipped with a 120mm smoothbore cannon and a modular armor system, which makes it almost impenetrable to enemy fire. The tank has a sophisticated fire control system and excellent mobility, which makes it an effective tank in combat situations.

There are numerous tanks available in the world today, and each of them has its unique features, advantages, and disadvantages. The M1A2 Abram, the T-14 Armata, and the German Leopard 2 are some of the most advanced and powerful tanks that are currently in use by various militaries around the world.

Does Russia still have T 55 tanks?

Yes, Russia still has T-55 tanks in its inventory. The T-55 was introduced in 1958 and was exported to various countries during the Soviet era. It has also been produced under license in multiple countries. Although it was replaced in Russian service by the T-72 and other newer tanks, the T-55 remains in use by some reserve and training units.

Additionally, the T-55 has been modernized with upgrades that improve its combat capabilities. These upgrades include improved armor, a new engine, and modern communication systems. Some T-55 tanks have also been upgraded with new fire control systems and improved gun stabilizers, making them more accurate and deadly on the battlefield.

While the T-55 is an older tank, it remains in use due to its low operating costs and ease of maintenance. The tank is also widely available on the global market, meaning that spare parts and ammunition are readily available. As such, many countries still use the T-55 in their armed forces, including Syria, Iran, and North Korea.

While the T-55 may not be the most advanced tank in existence, it remains a viable combat platform and serves as a testament to its designers’ ingenuity and engineering skill.

How many Type 90 tanks are there?

Therefore, the exact number of Type 90 tanks cannot be determined as it depends on various factors such as the production capacity, active usage, and deployment policy of the country that owns them.

To give context, the Type 90 is a third-generation main battle tank developed and deployed by the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force (JGSDF) in the early 1990s. It was designed to replace the older Type 74 tanks with advanced features such as composite armor, a smoothbore cannon, and an auto-loader system.

According to the available data, the initial batch of Type 90 tanks was produced in the late 1980s and early 90s. The production was carried out by the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and resulted in around 340-360 units of Type 90 tanks. Later on, the advanced Type 10 tanks replaced many of these Type 90 tanks. However, the Type 90s are still being used for training purposes and as a standby option.

Furthermore, it is also worth mentioning that the primary purpose of the Japanese tank forces is defensive rather than offensive, and the number of active tanks is relatively smaller than other countries. The data from Global Firepower 2021 Index shows that Japan currently has around 678 tanks in total (including Type 10 and Type 90 tanks). However, these numbers are subject to change depending on various factors such as upgrades, decommission, and new procurements.

Therefore, to sum up, while the exact number of Type 90 tanks is challenging to determine, it is evident that the JGSDF has deployed and maintained Type 90 tanks for several years, primarily for training purposes, and as a standby force.

Can a T-90 beat an Abrams?

The T-90 and the Abrams are both formidable tanks, but it is difficult to say definitively which one would come out on top in a battle.

The T-90 is a Russian-designed main battle tank that is known for its mobility and firepower. It is equipped with a powerful 125mm smoothbore gun that can fire a variety of ammunition types, including armor-piercing rounds and high-explosive shells. The T-90 is also well-protected thanks to its composite armor and explosive reactive armor (ERA) panels.

The Abrams, on the other hand, is a U.S.-designed main battle tank that is widely regarded as one of the most advanced tanks in the world. It is equipped with a 120mm smoothbore gun that can fire a variety of ammunition types, including depleted uranium rounds and laser-guided projectiles. The Abrams is also known for its advanced armor, which includes a layer of depleted uranium and explosive reactive armor (ERA).

In terms of firepower, the T-90 and the Abrams are fairly evenly matched. Both tanks are capable of penetrating each other’s armor with their main guns, although it may depend on the specific ammunition used and the angle of the shot. The Abrams may have a slight advantage in terms of accuracy and range, but the T-90 is more agile and can maneuver more easily in tight spaces.

When it comes to protection, both tanks are well-armored and equipped with ERA panels to provide additional protection against missiles and other threats. However, there is some debate over which tank is better protected. Some sources suggest that the Abrams has more effective armor, while others argue that the T-90’s composite armor is more advanced.

The outcome of a battle between a T-90 and an Abrams would depend on a variety of factors, including the specific weapons and ammunition used, the tactics employed by the crews, and the terrain on which the battle takes place. Both tanks are capable of inflicting significant damage on each other, but it is impossible to say which one would emerge victorious without more information.

Is T-80 better than T-72?

The answer to this question would depend on what criteria or factors are being used to compare the T-80 and T-72 tanks. It is worth noting that both vehicles are Soviet-era main battle tanks and both have similarities, as they were developed by the same manufacturer, Uralvagonzavod. However, there are significant differences between the two that might impact their performance and effectiveness on the battlefield.

One factor that is often considered in comparing tanks is their mobility. Mobility involves factors like speed, maneuverability, and the ability to cross different types of terrain. In this regard, the T-80 is generally superior to the T-72. The T-80 is faster, and its gas turbine engine allows for greater acceleration and speed than the diesel engine in the T-72. The T-80’s suspension system is also more advanced, allowing for greater maneuverability and mobility over uneven terrain. This would allow the T-80 to quickly move around the battlefield and avoid enemy fire more effectively than the T-72.

Armament is another important factor to consider when comparing tanks. The T-72 and T-80 both have similar armament, with a 125mm smoothbore gun being a major component of their firepower. However, the T-80 has a more advanced fire control system, which allows for greater accuracy and faster target acquisition. This means that the T-80 can hit targets more effectively at greater distances than the T-72, making it a more deadly weapon.

Armor is also a major factor in tank effectiveness. While the T-72 and T-80 have similar armor configurations, the T-80 includes more advanced reactive armor, which can more effectively protect the tank against incoming fire. This means that the T-80 is likely to be more durable in combat situations, and would be better able to survive enemy fire than the T-72.

Based on these factors, it can be argued that the T-80 is indeed better than the T-72. The T-80’s mobility, armament, and armor are all superior to those of the T-72, making it a more effective and safer vehicle in combat situations. Of course, each tank has its strengths and weaknesses, and the specific circumstances of a battle situation could impact which vehicle would be more effective. However, overall, the T-80’s advanced features make it a better overall tank than the T-72.

What is the difference between Russian T-72 and T-80?

The Russian T-72 and T-80 are both main battle tanks that were developed and produced by the Soviet Union during the Cold War. Although they share some similarities in terms of design and capabilities, they also have some significant differences that set them apart.

One of the most notable differences between the T-72 and T-80 is their engine. The T-72 is powered by a V-12 diesel engine, while the T-80 is equipped with a gas turbine engine. This gives the T-80 a significant advantage in terms of speed and maneuverability, as it is able to accelerate faster and maintain high speeds for longer periods of time.

Another difference between the two tanks is their armor. The T-80 features more advanced composite armor, which provides better protection against modern anti-tank weapons such as missiles and rocket-propelled grenades. The T-72, on the other hand, uses traditional steel armor that is less effective at stopping modern anti-tank weapons.

In terms of firepower, both tanks are equipped with a similar main gun – a 125mm smoothbore cannon that can fire a variety of ammunition types. However, the T-80 is capable of firing the AT-11 Sniper anti-tank missile from its gun barrel, which gives it an edge in long-range engagements. The T-72, on the other hand, does not have this capability.

Finally, the T-80 is more expensive to produce and maintain than the T-72, due to its advanced technology and complex design. For this reason, the T-80 is typically only used by elite units, while the T-72 is more widely deployed throughout the Russian military.

While the T-72 and T-80 share some similarities, they also have some significant differences in terms of engine, armor, firepower, and cost. Which tank is better suited for a particular situation will depend on a variety of factors, including the nature of the terrain, the capabilities of the enemy, and the objectives of the mission at hand.

Which WW2 tank can destroy an Abrams?

Firstly, it’s important to understand that tanks are designed to operate within a specific context and for a specific purpose. The Abrams tank was developed primarily for engaging enemy armored and mechanized units on the modern battlefield; it is heavily armored and is equipped with advanced weapons systems, making it a formidable force against other tanks.

In contrast, tanks used in World War II, such as the German Panther or the Soviet T-34, were designed to fight on a different type of battlefield. These tanks were intended to operate more independently, engaging enemy tanks and supporting infantry on the front lines. They were built with different specifications and with different purposes in mind, meaning that they might have different strengths and weaknesses vis-à-vis the Abrams tank.

In addition to these contextual differences, it’s also important to consider the advances in technology that have occurred between World War II and the development of the Abrams tank. For instance, the Abrams tank has advanced electronics and GPS systems that enhance its targeting capabilities and situational awareness. It is also equipped with a variety of offensive and defensive weapons systems, including machine guns, missile launchers, and reactive armor.

The question of which WW2 tank can destroy an Abrams is difficult to answer due to the broad array of factors that come into play. The effectiveness of any given tank depends on a variety of variables, including the terrain of the battlefields, the quality of the tank crews and support personnel, and numerous strategic, tactical, technical, and logistical factors. While different WW2 tanks such as the Panther or T-34 might have been able to compete with an Abrams tank in some situations, there is no definitive answer to this question without considering a wide variety of variables.

What tank will replace the Abrams?

The M1 Abrams is one of the most iconic main battle tanks in the world. It has been in service with the US military since the 1980s, and it has undergone several upgrades to keep it relevant on the modern battlefield. However, technology and warfare tactics are constantly evolving, and the US military is likely to look for a replacement for the M1 Abrams in the next decades.

The development of new tank designs is a complex and long process that involves several factors, such as the military’s strategic objectives, budget, technological advancements, and geopolitical considerations. Furthermore, the characteristics of future tanks will depend on the type of warfare they are expected to face. For instance, if the US military anticipates more urban warfare, it might prioritize tanks that are more agile and maneuverable, and with enhanced anti-IED (improvised explosive device) protection.

That being said, several ongoing and future tank projects suggest possible contenders to replace the Abrams. One of them is the Next-Generation Combat Vehicle (NGCV) program, which aims to develop a family of vehicles that can operate in a range of environments and missions. The NGCV program includes the Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle (OMFV), which will replace the aging Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle, and the Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF), which will provide high lethality and protection in a compact form factor.

Moreover, the US Army is also exploring the use of unmanned and autonomous tanks to reduce the risk to personnel and enhance battlefield awareness. For instance, the Robotic Combat Vehicle (RCV) program aims to develop three types of unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) – light, medium, and heavy – that will provide reconnaissance, suppression, and disruption capabilities. In the future, UGVs might also be integrated with manned tanks to form a combined-arms team that leverages their respective strengths and compensates for their weaknesses.

While it is uncertain what tank will replace the Abrams, the US military is actively exploring several options that aim to enhance its capabilities on the future battlefield. The next-generation tank is likely to embrace new technologies, such as unmanned systems, artificial intelligence, and advanced sensors, while maintaining a balance between firepower, mobility, and protection.

Has the US Army ever lost a Abrams tank?

The most significant loss of Abrams tanks occurred during the Gulf War in 1991, where a total of 23 Abrams tanks were destroyed by enemy fire, mostly due to friendly fire incidents. Moreover, during the recent Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts, the US Army lost a few Abrams tanks due to improvised explosive device (IED) attacks and other enemy actions.

Although losing any equipment in the battlefield or training is not ideal, the Abrams tank’s durability and strength have earned it a reputation as one of the most robust tanks in military history. Despite facing several engagements in different hostile settings, including urban environments, deserts, and rural areas, the Abrams tank has maintained its status as a reliable and effective armored vehicle.

Additionally, the US Army conducts regular training and maintenance programs to ensure the Abrams tank’s operational readiness and prevent equipment loss. These programs include testing and repairing tanks’ critical components, training soldiers on proper driving and operational procedures, and adhering to strict safety protocols to minimize accidents and equipment damage.

Although the US Army has lost Abrams tanks during conflicts and training missions, the tank’s proven durability and the military’s rigorous maintenance procedures have enabled it to maintain its status as a reliable and battle-proven machine.